How to write a CV that gets read in six seconds — without dumbing it down
Recruiters spend an average of seven seconds on the first pass. That's not a reason to cram the page — it's a reason to think harder about the first inch.
A collection of short essays about career changes — job searches, switches between industries, returns to work after a break. Most pieces are written by people going through it themselves. A few come from recruiters and hiring managers.
Recruiters spend an average of seven seconds on the first pass. That's not a reason to cram the page — it's a reason to think harder about the first inch.
No posts match that filter.
Most CVs are written to a generic ideal of the role. The CV that gets to interview is the one written to this job description, by someone who's read it the way a recruiter does.
Ten non-standard application strategies that can outperform the form-and-CV default. The meta-pattern matters more than any single trick: specific, low-effort to read, and tied to a real bet on a real company problem.
The honest version. Where the salary lands, where the identity scrapes, and the long second half of year one when the seniority you brought from the old career starts becoming visible.
Half the verbs on CV advice lists are dead on arrival. Here are the ones that survive a recruiter's six-second scan, plus the verbs to retire.
Both arguments, written honestly, with the questions to ask yourself instead of the ones LinkedIn tells you to. No verdict — you'll know which side you agree with by the end.
Non-linear careers don't need an apology — they need a narrative spine. Three story shapes that work, and the one most career-changers default to that quietly tanks the interview.
The verbs that earned you trust in your old industry mean nothing in your new one. How to translate experience honestly — without sliding into the kind of inflation hiring managers smell instantly.
A day-by-day prep plan for the week before a final-round interview. Light prep early, deep prep late, sleep the night before.
How recruiter inboxes actually get triaged — the subject lines that survive, the openers that don't, and the structural pattern shared by every CV that earns the second look.
How to translate domain experience into language a new field will recognise, and the four words to never put in your statement.
There is no secret list of unposted jobs. What exists is something more useful and harder to game: the warm intro market. How it actually works, and how to make yourself memorable to the three people most likely to be asked.
Most of us apply to too many jobs, too late, with too little care. A short note on triaging your shortlist before you open the editor.
Eight common post-interview phrases, decoded honestly. When to chase, when to let go, and the exact one-line note that gets a real answer rather than another week of waiting.
The phrase 'depending on experience' is doing more work than you think. How recruiters actually build a salary band — and the three signals that tell you whether you'll land at the top or the bottom of it.
After two years of 'do they even read these,' the answer turned out to be yes — but only if the first sentence does its job.
Spraying 200 CVs feels like productivity. Tailored applications convert at several times the rate of generic ones. The real conversion math behind a focused search — and why volume hides the problem it pretends to solve.
The predictable dip when early momentum fades and offers haven't landed. What to sharpen, what to stop, and what to wait out in the third-month trough.
References don't fail you by saying bad things. They fail you by sounding lukewarm. Here's how to brief a referee so the call gives the offer what it needs.
The forty-eight-hour thank-you note has rules nobody tells you. What to reference, what to never ask, and when silence is the better move.
The five-minute slot at the end of an interview is not a wind-down. It's the last data point — and the one most candidates fumble. Here's how to use it.
'I'm a perfectionist' is a structural tell. What a real answer sounds like, why self-awareness scores higher than the weakness itself, and the trap of being too honest.
The three things that get assessed in the opening five minutes — and the candidate worries that the research says barely matter.
Interviewers aren't asking for your life story. They're asking why you are in this room, today, for this role. A two-minute structure that answers the real question.
When the application form doesn't have a cover letter box, the pitch doesn't disappear — it moves. Three places to put the one sentence that earns you a first conversation.
A 90-word cover letter delivers the JD-specific signal a recruiter needs in the time they will actually give you. Here is the four-line template and a worked example.
Hook, match, proof, ask. Four sentences carry the whole job of a cover letter — every other line is filler the recruiter doesn't have time for.
A "Senior Manager" at a twelve-person startup does a different job than one at a bank. Here's how a single context line under your title earns it back, without inflating anything.
Recruiters worry less about the gap itself than about a candidate who pretends it isn't there. Here's how to name a career gap honestly, without apologising or over-explaining.
Every additional bullet pulls attention away from your best one. The marginal bullet has a negative expected value — it tells the recruiter your average, when they're only ever grading you on your best.
A wall of nouns proves nothing. 'Excel, PowerPoint, communication, leadership' tells a recruiter nothing they couldn't have assumed — skills belong inside your bullets, as evidence.
'Responsible for' is the verb of someone describing their job title back to themselves. Stronger openers — led, shipped, cut, rebuilt — tell a recruiter what you actually did in the first two words.
The two-page rule survives because recruiters scan, not because pages have intrinsic value. The real constraint is attention in the first seven seconds — and it lives at the top of page one.